Page 232 - California Stormwater Workshop Handouts
P. 232

Ecological Rights Foundation v. Pacific Lumber Co., 230 F.3d 1141 (2000)
51 ERC 1545, 31 Envtl. L. Rep. 20,246, 00 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8692...

[16] Environmental Law                                    Lumber’s Yager Camp and Carlotta mill operations in
            Notice requirements                           Humboldt County, California. The district court granted
                                                          Pacific Lumber’s motion for summary judgment on the
         Even if environmental groups’ 60-day notice      ground that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue. ERF and
         letter to logging company, which was             Mateel appeal the district court’s standing ruling. We
         prerequisite to bringing suit under Clean Water  conclude that the district court’s approach to standing
         Act (CWA), was inadequate as to company          cannot be squared with Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw,
         facility that included truck wash operation,     528 U.S. 167, 120 S.Ct. 693, 145 L.Ed.2d 610 (2000),
         composting area, and log decks, such             decided after the district court judgment issued in this
         inadequacy did not require dismissal of groups’  case, and that applying Laidlaw, the two plaintiff
         action in its entirety, absent allegation that   organizations do have standing to pursue this litigation.
         notice letter relating to company’s separate     Because Pacific Lumber’s other arguments, whether valid
         sawmill facility was also deficient. Federal     or not, would not support dismissal of this case, we
         Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of        reverse the judgment and remand the case for further
         1972, § 505(b)(1)(A), 33 U.S.C.A. §              district court proceedings.
         1365(b)(1)(A); 40 C.F.R. § 135.3.
                                                                                            I.

1 Cases that cite this headnote                                           Background

Attorneys and Law Firms                                   1. Yager Creek
                                                          Yager Camp and the Carlotta sawmill both abut Yager
*1143 Sharon E. Duggan, San Francisco, California, and    Creek. Runoff from these two facilities drains into the
William Verick, Klamath Environmental Law Center,         creek and waterways further downstream. The creek
Eureka, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.        flows through Yager Camp, a 150–acre site that includes
                                                          a truck wash operation, a composting area, and log decks
Jared G. Carter, Scotia, California, and Michael D.       to store logs before they are sent to the Carlotta sawmill.
Macomber and Frank Shaw Bacik, Ukiah, California, for     The mill, located just downstream of Yager Camp,
the defendant-appellee.                                   occupies more than 70 acres alongside the creek. The mill
                                                          facility also includes truck shops, an aggregate crusher,
                                                          and more log decks.

*1144 Appeal from the United States District Court for    Yager Creek flows into the Van Duzen River about a mile
the Northern District of California; Marilyn Hall Patel,  below the Carlotta mill. The Van Duzen in turn empties
District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV–97–00292–MHP.      into the Eel River, and the Eel reaches the Pacific Ocean
                                                          about 12 miles from Pacific Lumber’s facilities. Yager
Before: BOOCHEVER, TROTT and BERZON, Circuit              Creek and the other rivers in the Eel River system are
Judges.                                                   used for swimming, boating, and other recreational
                                                          activities. Various forms of wildlife inhabit the area
Opinion                                                   nourished by Yager Creek, and fish use the creek to
                                                          migrate to their spawning grounds.
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
                                                          Several members of ERF and Mateel use Yager Creek for
Plaintiff organizations Ecological Rights Foundation      recreation. They particularly enjoy their visits because
(“ERF”) and Mateel Environmental Justice Foundation       they can view wildlife in and around the creek. The
(“Mateel”) brought this lawsuit against Pacific Lumber    organizations’ members avoid some activities they would
Company alleging various violations of the Federal Water  otherwise enjoy in and around Yager Creek, however,
Pollution Control Act of 1972, better known as the Clean  because they fear that runoff from Pacific Lumber’s two
Water Act, see 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., at Pacific       facilities is damaging the creek and its wildlife, and enjoy

© 2015 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.                   4
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237